domingo, 25 de novembro de 2012

causes, related events: shapes: flowers, fountains & blackholes (changed to)

Basically what i have been saying is that everything sprung from the same Root or Primal Cause, that First Cause that preceded the material universe. And like the leaves of the a tree all share a relatively common Cx, so all the stars, all the atoms and all the living beings share a relatively common Cw, Cy and Cz respectively. 

That is, the cause behind a random leaf and the information that shaped it into what it is with all its properties, is similar to the cause and information that shaped all the other leaves that exist. Thus, we humans were able to form the concept of 'leaf'.

In the same fashion, we can say the same about the stars or atoms. Stars or atoms sprung from two different causes with their different corresponding information. This information shaped them into what they are, 'gave' them their essence. And thus, we humans we able to form their concepts. These concepts carry part of their information, and this information stemmed from a cause far away in sequential time. By going back on the cause-effect chain, we arrive at the first Primal Cause. The mother of all we perceive to exist in the universe.

When the cause-effect process occurs, an information pathway is established. This information pathway is fixed momentarily in the event. Events are the physical manifestation of the causal process. They are of a temporary nature. No event in the universe is permanent because time will eventually exert its 'force' on it, and turn it into something else. Events are like causes made manifest in the material universe. An epiphenomena of the causal process, but very useful because they give us clues to what's going on 'behind the curtain'.

Example 1:

An oak seed falls on fertile soil. The seed has inside it all the information that will eventually manifest as an oak. Here, the seed is the cause, it is hidden beneath the earth.
In this example, the effect — what the cause strives to be — is the full grown oak, the seed in its its full completion. The cause of the seed forces the development of the oak and the information in the seed gives it its shape and its properties.
In the process of becoming, the oak develops. First a little plant, then it grows stronger, strengthens its wood, its branches and if there are no impediments to its growth, it will 'fulfill' its cause and manifest all the information that seed-cause carried inside.

But i must make a distinction between the star, the oak tree, an object like a clock hanging on the wall and we, the humans. We have the faculty of the will coupled with that of the conscience of the self. And that changes a lot of stuff. We stem from a common cause, like everything else, but we are much more, our cause is a generating one, it's a creator cause, free form the determined fate of the oak seed when planted. The oak seed can never grow into a palm tree. And here is the big difference. 

Example 2:  

2.1 The Daisy and the Garden Fountain. These two apparently have nothing in common. Their causes, or what makes them what they are, appear to come from two completely different sources. A daisy is a flower. The garden fountain is a static-dynamic structure made of water. But looking at their shape, we can see similarities. They both spring from a surface into a vertical line the exact same way up until a point where they both open up, to give way to a circle-shape. Looking from above to a daisy or a fountain, we a circle with a center. The center of the daisy is where the seeds are. The daisy-seed is what gives the daisy-plant its shape. The center of the garden fountain is where the force that gives it its shape is most obvious. That pull that forces the water to come up.  So, C-flower and C-fountain most certainly have a C-f common to both with the exact same information.

2.2  Black-holes

This type of thought is useful.
There are endless analogies. The coconut tree is another one and so are black-holes. Except these are more difficult to understand. If it's true what physicists say, that there is some space curvature around the black-hole, then this curvature appears to me much like that of the fountain or the daisy. So at the center of said curvature, deep down, there would be a force that shapes the space around it into that linear clean x,y,z where newton laws smoothly apply. And that vertical tube-shape space of the black-hole can be compared to the daisy-stalk or that part of the fountain where water is being forced away from the center. And maybe it is the force at the deep-end of those black-holes scattered around in the universe that is responsible for keeping the universe linear-stable and viable for the creation of all the other stellar bodies. Actually, i could go further and say they may be the foundations or some kind of pillars, a kind of archways on top of which clean safe space rests in a linear grid.

Like in this image:

And astrophysicists also theorize about the existence of supermassive black-holes at the center of galaxies. This would make sense. Because in order to allow galaxies to play ball like they do, there should be a vast linear grid of space for them to do so. And only a very robust structure maintaining that surrounding space would sustain that. So supermassive blackholes are a bit like mega-structures or architectural crossbeams of the universe.

*edit 12 Dez

0 comentários: